In 3-5 sentences, compare and contrast the causes and effects of the development of constitutional monarchy in England with the development of absolute monarchy in Russia . (4 points)
The development of constitutional monarchy in England was largely driven by the desire to limit the power of the monarch and establish a system of checks and balances. This was achieved through events such as the Magna Carta, the Glorious Revolution, and the Bill of Rights. In contrast, the development of absolute monarchy in Russia was largely driven by the desire of the monarch to consolidate and centralize power. This led to the establishment of a highly centralized and autocratic system of government, with little to no limitations on the power of the ruler. The effects of these developments in England and Russia were also different, with England becoming a more democratic and representative government, while Russia remained under the absolute rule of the monarch.
To compare and contrast the causes and effects of the development of constitutional monarchy in England and absolute monarchy in Russia, start by understanding the historical context of both countries. Look into the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution as significant factors that led to the establishment of constitutional monarchy in England. For Russia, explore the reigns of key monarchs like Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great as catalysts for the rise of absolute monarchy. Pay attention to how the power distribution and limits on the monarchs differed between the two systems, as well as the consequences on society, governance, and political stability in both countries.
The development of constitutional monarchy in England and absolute monarchy in Russia had distinct causes and effects. In England, the causes for the development of constitutional monarchy stemmed from the Magna Carta in 1215, which curtailed the power of the monarchy and established fundamental rights for citizens. This eventually led to the Glorious Revolution of 1688, where the power balance shifted from the monarch to Parliament. Conversely, Russia's absolute monarchy developed from a long tradition of strong autocratic rulers, such as Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great, who centralized power and suppressed opposition. These developments in England and Russia had differing effects as well. The development of constitutional monarchy in England led to the establishment of representative government, protection of individual liberties, and the growth of a parliamentary system. On the other hand, the development of absolute monarchy in Russia resulted in a highly centralized and authoritarian government, limited political participation, and limited rights and liberties for the general population.
