In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, how did the process of judicial review allow the Supreme Court to decide on the case?(1 point)
Responses
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
The correct response is:
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
To clarify, the process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to review and evaluate the constitutionality of the policies in question. In the Brown v. Board of Education case, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, concluding that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision marked a significant step in the desegregation of American schools.
The correct response is: The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
The process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case by reviewing the constitutionality of the laws in question. In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the Supreme Court reviewed whether the practice of racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Judicial review is a power granted to the Supreme Court, which allows them to review the actions of the legislative and executive branches to ensure they are in line with the Constitution. In this case, the Supreme Court determined that separate but equal educational facilities were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause, thus ruling in favor of the plaintiff and against racial segregation in schools.