Which of the following statements best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?

a. An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlines in the constitution.

b. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.

c. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.

d. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.

d. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.

The correct answer is d. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.

In an absolute monarchy, all power is vested in a single monarch who holds unlimited power and authority. This concentration of power in one person can lead to instability, as the monarch's decisions and actions can become oppressive or unpopular, potentially leading to unrest and overthrow of the monarchy.

On the other hand, a constitutional monarchy is a system of government in which the powers of the monarch are limited by a constitution or a set of laws. The monarch's authority is typically shared with a governing body such as a parliament or legislature, ensuring checks and balances. This distribution of power can help in preventing the excessive concentration of authority and can contribute to long-term stability.

To determine which statement best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy, let's analyze each option to understand their accuracy and relevance.

a. "An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution."
This statement is not accurate. The duration of a monarchy, whether absolute or constitutional, is not solely determined by its form of government. Historical examples exist of both types lasting for extended periods of time or experiencing short reigns.

b. "An absolute monarchy always leads to a revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution."
This statement is overly simplistic and does not accurately represent the effects of each form of monarchy. While it is true that an absolute monarchy, due to its lack of checks and balances, may be more susceptible to revolution, it is not an absolute guarantee. Conversely, a constitutional monarchy does not necessarily prevent revolution.

c. "An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites."
This statement accurately describes a difference between the two forms of monarchy. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch holds significant power and is not bound by the control of other nobles. However, in a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's powers are typically limited by a constitution, which may include provisions to subordinate the monarch to the elites or other governing bodies.

d. "An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability."
This statement accurately highlights a potential risk associated with absolute monarchy. Relying heavily on a single monarch can make the system vulnerable to overthrow, particularly if the monarch becomes unpopular or misuses their power. On the other hand, a constitutional monarchy may provide a framework that promotes stability by distributing power across multiple branches or institutions.

Based on the analysis, the statement that best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:
d. "An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability."