Which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic?(1 point)
Responses
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500.
The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500.
The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.
The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.
The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls.
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is:
- The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The best statement that explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is the first statement:
"The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens."
To understand this difference, we need to look at the composition of the decision-making bodies in both systems. In the Athenian democracy, the ecclesia and Council of 500 were composed of citizens selected by lot from different territories. This means that any citizen could be chosen to participate in the decision-making process.
On the other hand, in the Roman Republic, the Senate was made up of wealthy patrician magistrates. This means that the power and influence in the decision-making process in the Roman Republic were concentrated in the hands of the privileged elite.
So, while Athenian democracy allowed for broader citizen participation and representation, the Roman Republic had a more exclusive and aristocratic structure.