Which of the following statements best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?(1 point)
Responses
An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.
An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.
An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution.
An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution.
An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.
An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
The correct statement is: An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
To determine which statement best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy, you can analyze each option and assess their accuracy.
Option 1: An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.
This statement highlights the difference in power dynamics between the two systems. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch holds absolute authority and is not accountable to other nobles. In contrast, a constitutional monarchy recognizes a higher authority or constitution that limits the power of the monarch, making them subordinate to the elites or other governing bodies. While this statement accurately captures the distinction, it repeats the exact same information twice, potentially suggesting an error in its duplication.
Option 2: An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution.
This statement compares the duration of the two types of monarchy. It suggests that absolute monarchy can endure for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy has a predetermined lifespan defined by the constitution. However, this assertion is not entirely accurate. The longevity of any monarchy depends on various factors, such as historical events, societal changes, and the will of the people. There are examples of both long-lasting absolute monarchies and constitutional monarchies throughout history.
Option 3: An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
This statement contrasts the stability of the two systems. It argues that an absolute monarchy, relying heavily on a single monarch, is more susceptible to being overthrown or destabilized. In contrast, a constitutional monarchy, which establishes a framework of governance beyond just one individual, can facilitate long-term stability. This highlights one of the key advantages often associated with constitutional monarchies.
Option 4: An absolute monarchy always leads to a revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.
This statement presents an extreme viewpoint by claiming absolute monarchy inevitably leads to revolution, while constitutional monarchy prevents it. However, political systems and revolutions are influenced by numerous factors, making such a conclusive statement inaccurate. While absolute monarchy historically faced challenges and revolts, not all instances resulted in revolution. Similarly, constitutional monarchies have experienced revolutions throughout history, such as the English Civil War.
Based on the accuracy and validity of the statements presented, the most suitable answer would be:
An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.