Which of the following charts best compares the goals of “big stick” diplomacy and dollar diplomacy?(1 point) Responses “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military Establish financial stability Reduced use of military intervention Expand U.S. economic interests End conflict by paying off aggressors Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability End conflict with military Establish U.S. military power Reinforce US control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict non-peacefully Expand U.S. economic interests Reduced use of military intervention Establish financial stability End conflict with military Establish U.S. military power Reinforce US control over Latin America “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduced use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power Expand U.S. economic interests “Big Stick” Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy End conflict peacefully Establish U.S. military power Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully Reduce use of military intervention Establish financial stability Expand U.S. economic interests

The correct answer is: "Big Stick" Diplomacy Dollar Diplomacy

End conflict with military intervention/force Establish financial stability
Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America End conflict peacefully
Reduce use of military intervention Establish U.S. military power
Expand U.S. economic interests

The correct answer is:

"Big Stick" Diplomacy:
- End conflict with military intervention/force
- Establish U.S. military power
- Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America

Dollar Diplomacy:
- Establish financial stability
- Reduce use of military intervention
- Expand U.S. economic interests

To compare the goals of "big stick" diplomacy and dollar diplomacy, we need to analyze the options provided. Let's break down the goals of each policy and compare them:

"Big Stick" Diplomacy:
- End conflict with military intervention/force
- Establish U.S. military power
- Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America

Dollar Diplomacy:
- Establish financial stability
- Expand U.S. economic interests
- Reduce use of military intervention

Now let's match these goals to the options:

Option 1:
- End conflict with military intervention/force (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Establish financial stability (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Reduced use of military intervention (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Expand U.S. economic interests (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- End conflict by paying off aggressors (not mentioned in either policy)
- Establish U.S. military power (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)

Option 2:
- End conflict non-peacefully (not mentioned in either policy)
- Expand U.S. economic interests (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Reduced use of military intervention (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Establish financial stability (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- End conflict with military (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Establish U.S. military power (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)

Option 3:
- End conflict non-peacefully (not mentioned in either policy)
- Expand U.S. economic interests (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Reduced use of military intervention (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Establish financial stability (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- End conflict with military (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Establish U.S. military power (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)

Option 4:
- End conflict with military intervention/force (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Establish financial stability (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- End conflict peacefully (not mentioned in either policy)
- Reduced use of military intervention (matches Dollar Diplomacy)
- Establish U.S. military power (matches "Big Stick" Diplomacy)
- Expand U.S. economic interests (matches Dollar Diplomacy)

Based on this analysis, option 2 (End conflict non-peacefully, Expand U.S. economic interests, Reduce use of military intervention, Establish financial stability, End conflict with military, Establish U.S. military power, Reinforce U.S. control over Latin America) best represents the goals of "big stick" diplomacy and dollar diplomacy.