What was done to punish the militia after the Chivington massacre?

They were executed by hanging.

They were court-martialed and dishonorably discharged.

They were not punished.

They were put in jail, then reassigned to new posts.

The militia involved in the Chivington Massacre were not punished for their actions. In fact, they faced little to no repercussions for their role in the massacre. Despite the public outrage and investigations that followed, no legal actions were taken against them. Many of the soldiers involved were simply reassigned to new posts. This lack of punishment for their atrocities remains a point of great controversy and criticism regarding the Chivington Massacre.

After the Chivington massacre, the militia members responsible for the atrocity were not adequately punished. Initially, there were no consequences for their actions. They were not executed, court-martialed, or dishonorably discharged. Instead, some of the militia members were briefly held in jail but were eventually released. Furthermore, they were reassigned to new posts rather than being held accountable for their role in the massacre.

To determine what was done to punish the militia after the Chivington massacre, we can look into historical records and reports. The Chivington massacre, also known as the Sand Creek massacre, occurred on November 29, 1864, when a Colorado Territory militia attacked and killed around 150 Cheyenne and Arapaho Native Americans, most of whom were women, children, and elderly. The incident aroused significant public outrage and led to subsequent investigations and inquiries.

After the Chivington massacre, the U.S. military initiated an inquiry, known as the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, to investigate the incident. The committee consisted of members of both the U.S. Congress and the Senate. However, it is important to note that the investigation primarily focused on the overall conduct of the war, rather than solely on the punishment of the militia involved in the Chivington massacre.

While the inquiry recognized the massacre as a reprehensible act, it did not lead to specific punishments for those responsible. Instead, the primary outcome of the investigation was the condemnation of the military's excessive use of force against Native American tribes during the conflict.

In summary, the militia involved in the Chivington massacre were not immediately punished for their actions. Although they were not executed by hanging, court-martialed and dishonorably discharged, or put in jail, the incident did result in a broader reevaluation of military actions and policies towards Native American tribes during this time.