How did McCulloch v. Maryland establish the implied powers doctrine?(1 point)
Responses
It allowed Congress to collect taxes even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to collect taxes even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to establish a post office even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to establish a post office even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to create a national bank even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to create a national bank even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to declare war even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
It allowed Congress to create a national bank even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
The correct response is: It allowed Congress to create a national bank even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
The correct response is:
It allowed Congress to create a national bank even though it was not expressed in the Constitution.
To understand how McCulloch v. Maryland established the implied powers doctrine, we need to analyze the case. McCulloch v. Maryland was a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1819. At the center of the case was the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States, which had been created by Congress in 1816.
Maryland, a state that was opposed to the national bank, attempted to impose a tax on the bank's operations within its jurisdiction. James McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the bank, refused to pay the tax, leading to the case being brought before the Supreme Court.
In its decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the power to establish the national bank, even though the Constitution did not explicitly grant this power. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the majority, reasoned that Congress has implied powers that are necessary and proper for executing its express powers.
This decision established the implied powers doctrine, which recognizes that Congress has the authority to take actions not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution if those actions are necessary and proper for carrying out its express powers. By determining that the creation of a national bank was within Congress's implied powers, the Supreme Court expanded the scope of federal authority beyond what was explicitly stated in the Constitution. This case set an important precedent for future interpretations of the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause and the extent of federal power.