Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings?(1 point)
Responses
a. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
b. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
c. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
d. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
The best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings is option c. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
The best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is option c. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
To determine the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings, let's analyze each response:
a. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
This answer is incorrect. Locke actually argued against the divine right of kings and believed that political power should be based on consent and the protection of natural rights.
b. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
This answer is partially correct. Hobbes did support the idea of absolute monarchy, but it does not specifically address his perspective on the divine right of kings.
c. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
This answer is also incorrect. While Locke famously rejected the divine right of kings, Hobbes actually supported it as a means to maintain social order and prevent chaos.
d. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
This answer is incorrect. While religion played a role in their philosophies, it does not accurately depict their perspectives on the divine right of kings.
Based on the analysis, the answer that offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is:
b. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.