Effectiveness and ineffectiveness of sahrc
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide a general overview of the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) according to public opinion and reports.
Effectiveness:
1. The SAHRC has been successful in addressing certain human rights violations in South Africa. For example, it has played a significant role in promoting and protecting the rights of vulnerable groups, including women, children and people with disabilities.
2. The SAHRC has established numerous partnerships and collaborations with civil society organizations, institutions and communities to promote awareness of human rights issues, and to encourage people to report any violations of their rights.
3. The SAHRC has launched several investigations and inquiries into various human rights issues, including the violation of children's and women's rights, issues of racism and xenophobia, and the right to access basic services.
Ineffectiveness:
1. The SAHRC has been criticized for its slow response in dealing with some of the most conflicted and urgent human rights issues. This has led to delays in addressing complaints and seeking justice for victims of human rights violations.
2. The SAHRC has limited power to enforce its recommendations and decisions, as its rulings are not legally binding. This has led some people to question the effectiveness of its actions and whether it can make any real impact.
3. There have been concerns raised about the lack of diversity within the SAHRC itself, particularly in terms of race and gender representation. This has led some people to question whether it can truly represent all sections of South African society.
In conclusion, the South African Human Rights Commission has been effective in some areas but has faced some criticism regarding its responsiveness, power and diversity.