Which statement provides the best evidence to support the claim that Burmese pythons have an impact on the environment?
Burmese pythons have no natural predators in the Everglades.
Burmese pythons were first introduced to Florida as pets.
Burmese pythons thrived in the Everglades ecosystem.
Burmese python numbers increased, and mammal populations decreased
Burmese python numbers increased, and mammal populations decreased provides the best evidence to support the claim that Burmese pythons have an impact on the environment. This suggests that the presence of Burmese pythons in the ecosystem is affecting the population dynamics of other species, leading to a decline in their numbers.
The statement that provides the best evidence to support the claim that Burmese pythons have an impact on the environment is: "Burmese python numbers increased, and mammal populations decreased."
The statement that provides the best evidence to support the claim that Burmese pythons have an impact on the environment is: "Burmese python numbers increased, and mammal populations decreased."
To determine which statement provides the best evidence, it is important to consider the logical connection between the statement and the claim. In this case, the claim is about the impact of Burmese pythons on the environment. So, we need to look for a statement that directly shows this impact. The other statements may provide some information related to Burmese pythons, but they don't directly demonstrate their impact on the environment.
The statement about Burmese python numbers increasing and mammal populations decreasing indicates a negative correlation between python presence and mammal populations. This observation suggests that the increasing numbers of Burmese pythons in the Everglades are affecting the mammal populations and, therefore, have an impact on the environment.