1. The Supreme Court decision in Gibbons v. Ogden, decided that the Commerce Clause in Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate interstate trade. How was that decision used to increase national power over the states? Select all that apply.
A.regulating a national minimum wage b.regulating out-of-state college tuition
C.passing the No Child Left Behind law
D.passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 e.passing the Fourteenth Amendment
1. regulating minimum wage AND passing the civil rights act of 1964
2. the commerce clause AND the incorporation doctrine
3. it requires states to make changes, sometimes without federal funds.
i hope this answer isnt two late
D.passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964
E.passing the Fourteenth Amendment
I need the whole quiz??
The Supreme Court decision in Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 affirmed that the Commerce Clause of the Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce. This decision had significant implications for the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
To understand how this decision increased national power over the states, we can examine the options provided and identify the ones that align with the decision's impact.
A. Regulating a national minimum wage:
This option is not directly related to interstate trade, but rather concerns the regulation of wages. The power to regulate a national minimum wage would rely on different constitutional grounds, such as the Commerce Clause. Therefore, it is not applicable.
B. Regulating out-of-state college tuition:
This option does involve interstate trade, as it pertains to the regulation of tuition fees for students attending colleges in different states. The decision in Gibbons v. Ogden did not specifically address this issue, but it established Congress's power to regulate interstate trade, which could encompass the regulation of out-of-state college tuition. Thus, this option is applicable.
C. Passing the No Child Left Behind law:
The No Child Left Behind Act, enacted in 2001, primarily focused on standards and accountability in education, rather than on regulating interstate trade. As a result, it is not directly linked to the Supreme Court decision in Gibbons v. Ogden. Therefore, this option is not applicable.
D. Passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark legislation that aimed to prohibit discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. While this act impacted the relationship between the federal government and states by enforcing equal protection under the law, it was not directly enabled by the Commerce Clause interpretation from Gibbons v. Ogden. Thus, this option does not contribute to an increase in national power over the states.
E. Passing the Fourteenth Amendment:
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, significantly expanded the protection of individual rights and equal protection under the law. While it did alter the power dynamics between the federal government and the states, the Fourteenth Amendment was not directly established or influenced by the Supreme Court decision in Gibbons v. Ogden. Therefore, this option does not apply.
In conclusion, the correct options that illustrate how the decision in Gibbons v. Ogden led to an increase in national power over the states are:
- B. Regulating out-of-state college tuition