At Marathon, how were the Greeks able to defeat the Persians?
here
“The Athenians on one wing and the Plataeans on the other were both victorious. Having got the upper hand, they left the defeated enemy to make their escape, and them drawing the two wings together into a single unit, they turned their attention to the Persians who had broken through in the centre.
The Greeks were able to defeat the Persians at the Battle of Marathon by using several strategic advantages and tactics. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how they achieved victory:
1. Background: In 490 BCE, the Persian Empire, led by King Darius I, sought to expand its empire westward by invading Greece. Athens, one of the Greek city-states, sent a small army to aid the Ionian Greeks who rebelled against Persia's rule. The primary Persian force landed at Marathon, a plain northeast of Athens.
2. Greek army composition: The Greek army, led by 10 commanders called strategoi, was a coalition force with a smaller Athenian contingent. The exact numbers are debated, but it is believed that the Greeks had around 10,000 soldiers, primarily hoplites.
3. Persian army composition: The Persian army, led by Datis and Artaphernes, had a larger force estimated at around 20,000 soldiers. They consisted of Persian infantry, archers, and cavalry, as well as a contingent of Greek mercenaries.
4. Positioning and waiting: The Greeks positioned themselves on higher ground, closer to the mountains, while the Persians landed on the coast. The Greeks waited, utilizing the element of surprise and hoping for assistance from their allies in Athens.
5. Strategic maneuver: The Persian cavalry, a significant threat to the Greek hoplites, was absent during the initial battle due to their positioning. The Greeks saw an opportunity and decided to charge the Persian army before their cavalry could regroup.
6. Hoplite phalanx: The Greek hoplites formed a phalanx, a tightly packed formation of heavily armored soldiers armed with spears, shields, and short swords. This formation provided mutual protection, making it difficult for the Persians to break through.
7. Shock charge: The Greek hoplites, using their spears and shields, conducted a shock charge against the Persian center. Despite being outnumbered, their disciplined formation and weight advantage allowed them to penetrate the weaker Persian line.
8. Persian flanks: The Greek wings, though thinner, managed to hold off the Persian flanking maneuvers, preventing encirclement. Their hoplite phalanx formation provided greater stability against the more lightly armored Persian troops.
9. Persian retreat: The Greek victory in the center and the resistance on the flanks created a sense of panic and confusion among the Persian forces. They started to retreat towards their ships, attempting to re-embark.
10. Chase and victory: The Greeks pursued the retreating Persians, inflicting heavy casualties and preventing them from regrouping. The Athenian contingent played a vital role in this pursuit as they were swift and well-trained.
11. Celebratory run: After defeating the Persians, a soldier named Pheidippides was sent from Marathon to Athens, covering approximately 26 miles (42 kilometers), to deliver the news of the victory. This inspired the tradition of marathon running.
In conclusion, the Greeks defeated the Persians at Marathon by employing strategic positioning, utilizing the hoplite phalanx formation, and taking advantage of the absence of the Persian cavalry. Their victory showcased the effectiveness of disciplined infantry, and it became a significant event in Greek history.
The Greeks were able to defeat the Persians at the Battle of Marathon through strategic planning and a combination of military tactics. Here's an explanation of how they achieved this victory:
1. Gathering intelligence: The Greeks had prior knowledge of the Persians' intended invasion and their numerical advantage. This information allowed them to prepare and strategize accordingly.
2. Choosing the battlefield: The Greek general, Miltiades, chose the battlefield at Marathon deliberately. The flat and open terrain favored the Greeks' hoplite infantry, who relied on close formation and heavy armor.
3. Delaying tactics: Miltiades employed delaying tactics, refusing to engage the Persian army immediately upon their arrival. This strategy prevented the Persians from taking advantage of their superior cavalry and archers.
4. Flanking maneuver: Recognizing that the center of the Persian line was weaker, Miltiades ordered his troops to charge at the Persian flanks. The Greek hoplites effectively pushed back the Persian infantry on both sides, creating chaos and breaking their formation.
5. Phalanx formation: The Greeks formed a tightly-knit phalanx formation, with soldiers interlocking their shields and presenting a unified front. This formation provided excellent protection, cohesion, and combined the spears' strength, making it difficult for the Persians to break through.
6. Skillful coordination: The Greek infantry demonstrated exceptional discipline and coordination, which allowed them to outmaneuver the larger Persian force. They maintained their formation and exploited weaknesses in the Persian line, creating opportunities for victory.
7. Psychological advantage: The Greeks utilized their morale and psychological advantage over the Persians. They were highly motivated to defend their homeland and were inspired by the recent Athenian democratic reforms.
8. Persian retreat: The combination of these factors led to the Persians' retreat and defeat. The Greek victory at Marathon was a turning point in the Greco-Persian Wars and boosted morale among the Greek city-states.
To summarize, the Greeks defeated the Persians through careful planning, utilizing their knowledge of the terrain, delaying tactics, flanking maneuvers, the effective use of the phalanx formation, skillful coordination, and taking advantage of their morale and psychological advantage.