The absolute age of a fossil can be found in a lab using radiometric dating. Why do you think scientists will sometimes use relative dating instead? What are the benefits?
One reason why scientists may choose to use relative dating instead of radiometric dating is because it is often quicker and less expensive. Relative dating involves comparing the age of a fossil or rock layer to other nearby fossils or rock layers, rather than determining the exact numerical age. This can provide a general idea of the age of the fossil or rock layer without the need for complex lab testing.
Relative dating can also be useful in cases where radiometric dating is not possible or accurate due to the lack of suitable materials for testing. It can also provide valuable information about the sequence of events and the relative timing of geological processes.
Overall, relative dating can provide a good estimate of the age of a fossil or rock layer without the need for expensive lab testing, making it a more practical and efficient method in some cases.