Question
In 3–5 sentences, compare the Eastern and Western Fronts of World War I in terms of their geography and strategies.(4 points)
The Eastern Front of World War I was characterized by its vast expanses of flat terrain, stretching from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea. This allowed for large-scale offensives and movement of troops, but also posed logistical challenges due to the lack of infrastructure. In contrast, the Western Front was marked by trench warfare along a relatively narrow strip of land, making movement difficult and leading to a stalemate.
In terms of strategies, the Eastern Front saw more fluid and dynamic engagements, with both sides attempting to outmaneuver each other through large-scale offensives. The Western Front, on the other hand, saw trench warfare dominating the battlefield, with both sides relying on attrition and defense rather than large-scale offensives.
Overall, the Eastern Front was more conducive to mobile warfare and rapid advances, while the Western Front was characterized by static defensive positions and brutal trench warfare. These differences in geography and strategies had a significant impact on the course and outcome of the war on each front.