"The Most Dangerous Game" How is Zaroff's philosophy on hunting different from Rainsford's? (1 point) Responses Zaroff thinks people are no more than animals. Zaroff thinks people are no more than animals. Zaroff thinks that animals deserve no compassion. Zaroff thinks that animals deserve no compassion. Zaroff thinks the world is divided into hunters and the hunted. Zaroff thinks the world is divided into hunters and the hunted. Zaroff thinks that big-game hunting is the most fascinating form of hunting.
Rainsford, on the other hand, believes that hunting is a sport and should be done with respect for the animal being hunted. He believes in fair play and does not see humans as just another form of prey. Rainsford's philosophy on hunting is more ethical and humane compared to Zaroff's belief that humans are no different from animals and can be hunted without remorse.
