#22 Constructed-Response (SHORT 1-3 paragraphs)
How are the viewpoints of “GMOs Can Feed the World” and “Are GMOs Really Safe?” different? Use details from BOTH passages to support your answer. Write your answer in the space provided below.
**Remember to use the RACE strategy!
The viewpoints of “GMOs Can Feed the World” and “Are GMOs Really Safe?” differ in their overall stance on genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The first passage argues that GMOs have the potential to address issues of global hunger and food insecurity by increasing crop yields and creating more resilient plants. It emphasizes the benefits of GMOs in terms of addressing food scarcity and improving food production on a global scale. On the other hand, the second passage expresses concerns about the safety of GMOs, particularly in terms of potential health risks and environmental impact. It questions the lack of long-term studies on the health effects of consuming GMOs and raises doubts about the safety of genetically modified foods.
In “GMOs Can Feed the World,” the author highlights the positive impacts of GMOs on addressing food shortages and increasing food production, citing examples of successful GMO crops that have benefitted farmers and consumers. The passage argues that GMOs have the potential to play a crucial role in feeding a growing global population and improving food security. In contrast, “Are GMOs Really Safe?” raises doubts about the safety of GMOs, pointing to controversies and conflicting research on the potential risks of consuming genetically modified foods. The passage calls for more research and transparency in order to ensure the safety of GMOs for human consumption and the environment.