How are the viewpoints of “GMOs Can Feed the World” and “Are GMOs Really Safe?” different? Use details from BOTH passages to support your answer. Write your answer in the space provided below.
**Remember to use the RACE strategy!
The viewpoints of “GMOs Can Feed the World” and “Are GMOs Really Safe?” are different in terms of their focus and perspectives on genetically modified organisms. In “GMOs Can Feed the World,” the author argues that GMOs are essential for increasing crop yields and ensuring food security for the growing global population. The author highlights the benefits of GMOs in terms of higher productivity, lower costs, and the ability to withstand climate change and pests. On the other hand, “Are GMOs Really Safe?” raises concerns about the potential risks and long-term effects of GMOs on human health and the environment. The author questions the safety of GMOs due to lack of long-term studies and the presence of allergens and toxins in some genetically modified crops. Overall, while “GMOs Can Feed the World” emphasizes the positive impact of GMOs on food production, “Are GMOs Really Safe?” raises important questions about their safety and potential risks.
