Analyze the benefits and the drawbacks of direct democracy. Compare it to a representative democracy. Which form serves the interests of the public in different situations? Give examples in 2 sentences (4 points)
Direct democracy allows citizens to have more direct influence and control over decision-making, promoting increased civic engagement and participation. However, it can be time-consuming and inefficient, as it requires individuals to be well-informed on a wide range of issues in order to make informed decisions.
Representative democracy, on the other hand, allows for elected officials to make decisions on behalf of the public, which can be more efficient and effective in managing complex issues. However, it may lead to disconnect between the government and the will of the people, as representatives may not always accurately reflect the desires of their constituents.
In situations where major decisions need to be made quickly, such as in times of crisis or emergencies, direct democracy may be more effective in ensuring swift action and direct input from the public. However, in situations where specialized knowledge and expertise are needed to make informed decisions, representative democracy may better serve the public interest, such as in complex policy-making or international negotiations.