Hawaii was annexed by the United States in 1898 through a joint resolution by Congress. The decision was controversial at the time because it was done without the consent of the Hawaiian people. The annexation of Hawaii was largely driven by economic interests, specifically the desire for access to the island's sugar and pineapple plantations. Some argue that the U.S. should not have annexed Hawaii because it violated the sovereignty of the native Hawaiian people. Others believe that Hawaii benefited from becoming a U.S. territory, gaining military protection and economic development. Overall, the annexation of Hawaii remains a contentious issue with no clear-cut answer as to whether it was justified.
I believe no, because the term "annex" refers to taking an area of land or territory by force or without consent.
You make a valid point. The annexation of Hawaii did indeed happen without the consent of the Hawaiian people, and it could be seen as a violation of their sovereignty. The use of military force or economic coercion to acquire territory goes against principles of self-determination and respect for the rights of indigenous peoples. In this context, the annexation of Hawaii could be viewed as ethically questionable. It is important to consider the perspectives of those affected by such actions and strive for more just and equitable approaches to territorial acquisitions.
