Identify the chosen building. Why do you think the architect chose a pyramid for the shape of the building?
• How would you design this building as a prism? Justify.
• How would the change in shape affect the construction of the building?
• How would the change in shape affect the use of the building? Use the concept of volume in this post.
"hen read two of your peers' posts. Respond to two of your peers:
• For each post, explain why the pyramid or prism is a better shape for the building.
• How would you improve on the identified pyramid-shaped building?
• How would you improve on the alternate prism-shaped building?
The chosen building is the Louvre Museum in Paris, France, specifically the glass pyramid entrance designed by architect I.M. Pei. The architect likely chose a pyramid shape for the entrance because it has a striking and iconic appearance, symbolizing strength, stability, and grandeur. Additionally, the pyramid shape allows natural light to filter into the underground spaces, creating a bright and inviting atmosphere for visitors.
If I were to design this building as a prism instead of a pyramid, I would create a more angular and modern look. A prism shape would still allow for natural light to filter in, but the interior spaces may feel more angular and less expansive compared to the pyramid design.
The change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would significantly affect the construction of the building. A prism shape would require more angular walls and potentially more support structures to account for the lack of a pointed top, leading to increased complexity in construction and potentially higher costs.
In terms of use, the change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would impact the volume of the building. A prism shape would likely have a smaller overall volume compared to a pyramid, potentially leading to less exhibition space or smaller interior rooms. This could affect the functionality of the building and restrict the displays or experiences available to visitors.
Peers' responses:
1. The pyramid shape is a better choice for the Louvre Museum entrance because of its iconic and grand appearance, which is consistent with the museum's status as a cultural institution. A prism shape may not have the same level of visual impact and may not convey the same sense of importance and significance. To improve on the pyramid-shaped building, additional elements could be added around the entrance to enhance its functionality or aesthetics, such as green spaces or seating areas.
2. A prism shape may be a better choice for the building because it could create a more modern and angular look that fits with contemporary design trends. The prism shape could also provide more interior space and potentially better flow for visitors. To improve on the prism-shaped building, the angles and proportions could be adjusted to create a more visually appealing and dynamic design, potentially incorporating more glass elements for natural light and transparency.
Short
The chosen building is the Louvre Museum's glass pyramid entrance in Paris, France. The architect likely chose a pyramid shape for its iconic appearance and ability to draw in natural light.
If designed as a prism, the building would have a more angular and modern look and potentially smaller interior spaces.
The change in shape would impact construction complexity and volume of the building, potentially affecting functionality and visitor experience.
Peer 1: The pyramid shape is better for the Louvre entrance due to its grand appearance. To improve, additional elements could be added around the entrance.
Peer 2: A prism shape may offer a modern look and more interior space. To improve, angles and proportions could be adjusted for a more dynamic design.