Think about the apple and pea plant investigations. Compare and contrast the two. Give examples from the readings in your comparison. Also give examples from what you may already know.
Write your answer in the box below.
The investigations of the apple and pea plants share similarities in terms of the scientific method being applied to study plant growth and development. Both investigations involved observing the changes in the plants over time, recording data, and analyzing the results to draw conclusions about how different factors affect plant growth.
One key difference between the two investigations is the specific variables that were studied. In the apple investigation, the focus was on the effect of different types of soil on apple tree growth. For example, the article "Apple Experiment - Soil Types Importance" discussed how sandy soil led to poor drainage and resulted in stunted apple trees, while clay soil retained too much water and caused root rot. On the other hand, the pea plant investigation focused on the impact of light on plant growth. As mentioned in the article "Effects of Light on Plants," peas require at least five hours of sunlight per day to thrive and produce healthy crops.
From what I already know, apples are fruit-bearing trees that require proper soil composition for optimal growth, while pea plants are legumes that are sensitive to light exposure. This knowledge aligns with the findings of the respective investigations and highlights the importance of understanding the specific needs of different plant species in scientific studies.
Overall, both the apple and pea plant investigations showcase how the scientific method can be applied to study plant growth and highlight the importance of considering variables such as soil type and light exposure in agricultural research.