Based on your experience with the simulation, how would you describe the following social movements—The Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street, and Black Lives Matter. Are they direct or indirect; reformist or radically oriented? Explain your reasoning.
The Tea Party movement can be described as a direct and radically oriented social movement. It was focused on small government principles, lower taxes, and fiscal responsibility. The movement was outspoken in its goals and utilized direct actions such as protests and lobbying to push for its agenda.
Occupy Wall Street, on the other hand, can be seen as a direct and reformist movement. It was a response to the perceived social and economic injustices perpetuated by Wall Street and the financial sector. The movement focused on income inequality, corporate greed, and corruption in the political system. While the movement utilized direct actions such as occupations and protests, its goals were more focused on calling for regulatory reforms and systemic change rather than radical overthrow of the existing system.
Black Lives Matter is a direct and radically oriented social movement. It was formed in response to police brutality and systemic racism against Black people. The movement has taken direct actions such as protests, marches, and civil disobedience to bring attention to these issues. Black Lives Matter also calls for radical changes to the criminal justice system and police practices in order to address racial inequality and systemic racism.
Overall, the Tea Party movement and Black Lives Matter can be classified as radically oriented due to their focus on challenging and changing fundamental aspects of society. Meanwhile, Occupy Wall Street falls more into the reformist category as it seeks to improve existing systems rather than completely overhaul them.