Cite at least two examples of this view from this article using quotes: Although at the postwar peace talks President Woodrow Wilson wished above all to prevent future wars, the Treaty of Versailles, which formally ended World War I, is widely considered to have contributed to the rise to power of the Nazi party in Germany. Was the Treaty of Versailles a legitimate and justified attempt by the victorious powers to ensure that Germany would never again pose a military threat? Or did the Treaty, as the Nazis and many other politicians in Germany claimed, place an unfair and unnecessarily punitive burden on Germany? Was the supposed unfairness of the Treaty a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany—or was it merely a convenient rhetorical tool for German politicians to exploit? If the unfairness of the Treaty were indeed a cause of fascism in Germany, how do we explain the rise of fascism in Italy (which fought on the side of the allies in World War I) or the existence of fascist movements in Britain, the Netherlands, and other Western democracies in the 1930s?

Question

And write like a fourth grader

Answer 1

The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty that ended World War I. Some people think the Treaty was unfair to Germany and helped the Nazis come to power. The Treaty of Versailles put a lot of restrictions on Germany and made them pay a lot of money. This made the German people feel angry and humiliated. This anger and humiliation helped the Nazi party gain support. Another example is how the Nazis used the Treaty of Versailles to gain followers. They said it was unfair and blamed all of Germany's problems on the Treaty. This made people want to support the Nazis and their promise to make Germany strong again.