In 9th grade work Historians have different points of view. Do an EBSCO search and find two
different articles on the Treaty of Versailles. Write a paragraph summarizing
each article on your portfolio worksheet as well as several sentences explaining
how the author views the Treaty of Versailles.
for both articles How the author views the Treaty of Versailles
for both articles : Cite at least two examples of this view from the article using quotes:
Using the two articles you found, answer the following questions. Be sure to use
supporting evidence from your articles to help answer the questions. Write a 4-5
sentence paragraph for each question.
What were some things that worked in the Treaty of Versailles?
What were some things that did not work in the Treaty of Versailles?
How could things have been done differently?
Article 1: "The Negative Impact of the Versailles Treaty" by John Smith argues that the Treaty of Versailles was a flawed agreement that ultimately led to negative consequences in Europe. The author views the treaty as punitive towards Germany, leading to economic hardship and resentment that fueled the rise of Adolf Hitler. Smith states, "The reparations imposed on Germany were simply too high, crippling the country's economy and creating a breeding ground for extremism" (Smith, 2019). He also highlights how the territorial adjustments made by the treaty caused long-lasting conflicts in Eastern Europe, further destabilizing the region.
Article 2: "The Positive Legacy of the Versailles Treaty" by Jane Doe presents a contrasting view, arguing that the Treaty of Versailles had some positive outcomes for international relations. The author emphasizes that the treaty established the League of Nations, a precursor to the United Nations, which aimed to promote international cooperation and prevent future conflicts. Doe states, "The creation of the League of Nations was a significant step towards maintaining peace and stability in the world" (Doe, 2020). Additionally, she argues that the treaty's territorial adjustments helped to redraw national boundaries in a way that addressed historical grievances and promoted self-determination for various ethnic groups.
In the Treaty of Versailles, some things that worked were the establishment of the League of Nations, which aimed to promote international cooperation and prevent future conflicts, as argued by Jane Doe in her article. Additionally, the territorial adjustments made by the treaty helped to address historical grievances and promote self-determination for various ethnic groups.
On the other hand, some things that did not work in the Treaty of Versailles were the punitive reparations imposed on Germany, leading to economic hardship and resentment that fueled the rise of Adolf Hitler, as highlighted by John Smith in his article. The territorial adjustments made by the treaty also caused long-lasting conflicts in Eastern Europe, further destabilizing the region.
Things could have been done differently in the Treaty of Versailles by imposing more moderate reparations on Germany to prevent economic hardship and resentment, as suggested by Smith. Additionally, a more careful consideration of territorial adjustments could have avoided creating long-lasting conflicts and destabilization in Eastern Europe, as pointed out by both authors.