In 1–2 sentences, analyze why critics of super PACs argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC has increased the freedom of speech of wealthy individuals and groups, but not of the average American.(2 points)
Critics argue that the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC has allowed wealthy individuals and groups to exert undue influence over elections through unlimited campaign contributions, drowning out the voices of average Americans who cannot afford to compete financially. This has led to concerns that the political system is increasingly skewed in favor of the wealthy and corporate interests, undermining the principles of democracy.
