Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

What is the difference between a limited war and a total war?(1 point)

Responses

Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer. With a total war, those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy.
Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer. With a total war, those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy.

Limited war targets civilians and infrastructure because it has a limited scope of focus, while total war targets everything because it has no focus.
Limited war targets civilians and infrastructure because it has a limited scope of focus, while total war targets everything because it has no focus.

Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because of the rules of engagement that both sides agree to ahead of time. Total war does not have agreed-upon rules of engagement.
Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because of the rules of engagement that both sides agree to ahead of time. Total war does not have agreed-upon rules of engagement.

Limited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal. With total war, the goals are not limited and are often numerous and specific.

Limited war is a conflict in which there are restrictions placed on the goals, methods, and targets of the warring parties. These restrictions may include limits on civilian casualties, damage to infrastructure, or territorial ambitions. Total war, on the other hand, is a conflict in which there are no such restrictions. The goal of total war is the complete annihilation of the enemy, with no limitations on the means used to achieve that goal. Total war typically involves targeting civilians and infrastructure, as well as using tactics such as bombing campaigns and scorched earth policies.