Question

summarise:

The 11 justices of the Constitutional Court bench were sharply divided, and they handed down a majority and minority judgment. The majority of the Constitutional Court held that the court must indeed protect the best interests of the prospective child. The tacit principle underlying the majority judgment can be articulated as follows: The scope of possible reproductive decisions that prospective parents may take, at least in the context of artificial reproduction, should be legally limited to exclude decisions that will cause harm to the prospective child.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The Constitutional Court was divided on the issue, with a majority holding that the court must protect the best interests of the prospective child. They ruled that decisions of prospective parents in artificial reproduction should be legally limited to prevent harm to the child.