summarise in your own words:
verall, the Rome Statute of the ICC provides a comprehensive framework for addressing international crimes and holding individuals accountable for their actions. The inclusion of specific provisions on jurisdiction, admissibility, individual criminal responsibility, and fair trial rights ensures that justice is served in cases of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.
However, there are some criticisms of the Rome Statute, particularly regarding the limitations on jurisdiction and the ability of the United Nations Security Council to refer cases to the ICC. The role of the Security Council in referring cases has been seen as politically motivated and potentially biased, as certain countries may use their veto power to shield their own interests.
Additionally, some critics argue that the principle of complementarity does not always work effectively in practice, as national judicial systems may be unwilling or unable to prosecute individuals responsible for international crimes. This raises concerns about the ICC's ability to provide justice for victims in cases where national courts are unwilling or unable to act.
Overall, the Rome Statute of the ICC plays a crucial role in holding individuals accountable for grave international crimes and promoting justice and accountability on a global scale. However, ongoing challenges remain in ensuring the effectiveness and credibility of the Court in addressing these crimes.