Question

Analyze the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Which of the following is the most likely reason the

justices ruled as they did?(1 point)
Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses.
Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone call.
Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause.
Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in Miranda v. Arizona is that Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination required law enforcement officials to inform individuals of their rights before questioning them in a custodial setting. This led to the creation of the "Miranda Rights," which include the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during questioning. The failure to inform Miranda of his right to remain silent was a key factor in the Court's decision in this case.