Most courts have adopted one of two tests for design and warning cases what are these tests
The two tests that most courts have adopted for design and warning cases are the risk-utility test and the consumer expectations test.
1. Risk-utility test: This test considers whether the potential risks of a product outweigh its utility or benefits. Courts will analyze whether the design of a product is reasonable based on factors such as the likelihood of harm, the severity of potential harm, the feasibility of alternate designs, and the cost of implementing those designs.
2. Consumer expectations test: This test focuses on whether a product fails to meet the ordinary expectations of consumers. If a product does not perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect, then the manufacturer may be held liable for any resulting harm. This test is more straightforward and does not require a detailed analysis of the product's design and risks.