Should the U.S. have annexed Hawaii, and why?
There is no easy answer to this question as it is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides.
Those in favor of the annexation argue that Hawaii was strategically important for the U.S. in terms of military positioning in the Pacific. Additionally, the annexation allowed for economic benefits for American sugar planters and businessmen who had significant interests in Hawaii.
On the other hand, opponents argue that the annexation of Hawaii was a violation of the sovereignty of the Hawaiian people, who had their own monarchy and government prior to U.S. intervention. The overthrow of the Hawaiian Queen Lili'uokalani in 1893 was seen as a betrayal of indigenous rights and self-determination.
Ultimately, whether or not the U.S. should have annexed Hawaii is a matter of perspective and interpretation of historical events. It is important to acknowledge the complex and problematic history of U.S. involvement in Hawaii and the impact it had on the Hawaiian people.