Compare the interest a multinational corporation has on foreign policy with the interest an ethnic group has.(1 point)

Responses

MNCs are most interested in limiting the influence of ambassadors on foreign policy. Ethnic interest groups speak on behalf of people from their homeland.
MNCs are most interested in limiting the influence of ambassadors on foreign policy. Ethnic interest groups speak on behalf of people from their homeland.

MNCs are most interested in influencing favorable global business policies, such as trade policies. Ethnic groups limit the influence of ambassadors.
MNCs are most interested in influencing favorable global business policies, such as trade policies. Ethnic groups limit the influence of ambassadors.

MNCs are most interested in influencing favorable global business policies, such as trade policies. Ethnic interest groups speak on behalf of people from their homeland.
MNCs are most interested in influencing favorable global business policies, such as trade policies. Ethnic interest groups speak on behalf of people from their homeland.

MNCs are most interested in influencing the U.S. government’s relationships with other governments. Ethnic interest groups lobby for fair wages.

MNCs are primarily concerned with advancing their own business interests on a global scale, while ethnic interest groups focus on advocating for the rights and well-being of specific ethnic communities. MNCs often seek to influence government policies that benefit their bottom line, while ethnic groups may mobilize to address issues such as discrimination, cultural preservation, or human rights abuses affecting their community. Ultimately, MNCs prioritize profit and market access in foreign countries, while ethnic groups prioritize the welfare and representation of their members in the political arena.