How has one specific Supreme Court ruling expanded freedom of speech by limiting a public official’s ability to press for libel?(1 point)

Question

How has one specific Supreme Court ruling expanded freedom of speech by limiting a public official’s ability to press for libel?(1 point)

Responses

a New York Times v. United States determined that libel is allowed in certain instances.

b Near v. Minnesota determined that libel is allowed if it serves the interest of the public.

c Adams v. Jefferson determined that pursuing charges of libel is unconstitutional.

d New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue charges of libel in the case of a public official.

Answer 1

d New York Times v. Sullivan determined that actual malice must be proven to pursue charges of libel in the case of a public official. This ruling expanded freedom of speech by setting a higher standard for public officials to prove libel, protecting the rights of individuals to criticize and speak out against government officials without fear of legal repercussions.