Based on the data from the table, it can be observed that Group B plants consistently have higher average heights compared to Group A plants throughout the weeks.

In Week 1, the average height of Group A plants was 2 cm, whereas it was 3 cm for Group B plants. In each subsequent week, the ratio of average heights between the two groups remains around 0.7, with Group B consistently having higher average heights. This pattern indicates that as the root space increases (from 3 cm to 10 cm), there is a positive effect on plant growth.

To determine whether this effect is likely due to environmental or genetic factors, the student would need to conduct additional experiments. One approach would involve altering the environmental conditions for both groups of plants while keeping the root space constant. For example, the student could vary the amount of water or sunlight received by each group and note any changes in plant growth.

If the effect of root space on plant growth remains consistent regardless of environmental changes, then it would suggest that the observed effect is more likely due to genetic factors. On the other hand, if altering environmental conditions significantly impacts the growth of both groups, it would indicate that the effect of root space is primarily driven by environmental factors.
Make this shorter.

The data shows that Group B plants consistently have higher average heights than Group A plants, indicating a positive effect of increased root space on plant growth. To determine whether this effect is due to environmental or genetic factors, additional experiments altering environmental conditions for both groups of plants are needed. If the effect of root space remains consistent regardless of environmental changes, it suggests genetic factors play a role. If changing environmental conditions significantly impacts growth, environmental factors are likely driving the effect of root space.