whether state sovereignty must be applied as absolute norm in public international law?
There is ongoing debate among legal scholars and practitioners about whether state sovereignty should be considered an absolute norm in public international law. Some argue that state sovereignty is a fundamental principle that should be upheld at all costs, as it is the foundation of the international legal system and essential for maintaining stability and order among states. Others believe that there are instances where the principle of sovereignty should be overridden in order to protect human rights, promote international cooperation, or address global challenges such as climate change or terrorism.
Ultimately, the concept of state sovereignty is complex and nuanced, and its application in international law often depends on the specific circumstances and context of a situation. While sovereignty is a vitally important principle, it may need to be balanced with other competing interests in certain situations. Therefore, it is important for legal experts and policymakers to carefully consider the implications of applying state sovereignty as an absolute norm in public international law.