Questions LLC
Login
or
Sign Up
Ask a New Question
Legal Studies
Constitutional Law
Judicial Review
What does Marshall say is the duty of the court ",2-3! A law is repugnant to the Constitution"?
1 answer
Marshall says that it is the duty of the court to declare that the Constitution is supreme and that any law that is repugnant to it must be void.
You can
ask a new question
or
answer this question
.
Related Questions
After gold was discovered in Dahlonega, Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v.
Use the texts Law of the Land and TFK Explains: The Supreme Court to answer the question.
Law of the Land TFK Explains: The
Civics Unit Test
7 of 237 of 23 Items Question Use the texts Law of the Land and TFK Explains: The Supreme Court to answer the
After gold was discovered in Dahlonega, Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v.
18. What is the significance of John Marshall ruling in Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison was a case held by the Supreme
Compare the interview "On the Front Lines with Thurgood Marshall" with the informational piece "'Equal Justice Under Law':
Who was John Marshall, and what role did he play in the development of the American government and the Supreme Court?(1 point)
Due to inequality and unfairness, Thurgood Marshall argued that
(1 point) Responses "separate, but equal" must stand. "separate,
HISTORY: THE COURT SYSTEM QUICK CHECK.
FROM WHICH COURT WOULD AN APPEAL GO DIRECTLY TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT? 1. CLAIMS COURT.
What does Marshall say is the duty of the court "when a law is repugnant to the Constitution.?"