Argumentative Text
Prompt: Many people believe that education could be changed for the better. Some changes might be small, like the inclusion or exclusion of a specific text in a class. Some changes are system wide, like setting aside time each day for students to take part in self-motivated exploratory learning. What change do you think would improve education? In this essay, you will be arguing in favor of your idea.
To do this:
1. State the change you want to make as clearly as you can in a single sentence (e.g. To improve education we/schools/government should ________ )
This is your thesis.
2. Research your topic and come up with 3-4 arguments in favor of the change you are proposing.
1. Argument 1
2. Argument 2
3. Argument 3
4. Argument 4
3. Research/come up with the opposition’s best argument. Present it the best you can and then provide your counterargument. Why is their argument wrong/irrelevant/not convincing/etc.?
4.- Write out your essay in MLA format, making sure to include a hooking introduction and a finalizing conclusion.
Notes:
You will need to find 2-3 sources for this essay. They should be cited in MLA format.
There is no page requirement for this essay. Just make sure you include all necessary elements.
Thesis: To improve education, schools should implement individualized learning plans for each student.
Argument 1: Individualized learning plans cater to the unique needs of each student. By creating personalized plans, teachers can identify and address each student's strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles. This approach allows for a more tailored and effective educational experience, leading to better academic outcomes.
Argument 2: Individualized learning plans promote student autonomy and motivation. When students have a say in their own education, they are more likely to be engaged and invested in their learning. By giving students the opportunity to set their own goals and track their progress, they become active participants in their education, leading to increased motivation and success.
Argument 3: Individualized learning plans foster a sense of accountability and responsibility. Students are more likely to take ownership of their learning when they are involved in the planning process. This sense of responsibility encourages students to stay on track, seek help when needed, and strive for academic excellence.
Argument 4: Individualized learning plans support diversity and inclusion in the classroom. By recognizing and embracing the unique backgrounds, learning styles, and abilities of each student, schools can create a more inclusive and equitable learning environment. This approach ensures that all students have the opportunity to succeed and thrive academically.
Opposition's best argument: Critics may argue that implementing individualized learning plans for each student is time-consuming and resource-intensive. They may argue that teachers already have limited time and resources, and adding personalized plans for each student may be overwhelming and impractical.
Counterargument: While it is true that implementing individualized learning plans may require additional time and resources, the long-term benefits far outweigh the initial investment. By tailoring education to the needs of each student, schools can improve academic outcomes, increase student engagement, and foster a more inclusive and diverse learning environment. In the end, the success and well-being of students should always be the top priority in education.
Overall, implementing individualized learning plans for each student is a crucial step towards improving education. By recognizing and addressing the unique needs of each student, schools can create a more effective, engaging, and equitable learning experience for all.