How did sharecropping affect the lives of freedmen?

(1 point)
Responses

It provided job security, encouraging freedmen to stay in the South.
It provided job security, encouraging freedmen to stay in the South.

High debt kept freedmen from becoming financially secure.
High debt kept freedmen from becoming financially secure.

It prevented them from being able to vote in elections.
It prevented them from being able to vote in elections.

Freedmen didn’t have enough land to feed their own families.
Freedmen didn’t have enough land to feed their own families.

All of the responses are correct. Sharecropping had various effects on the lives of freedmen. It did provide job security and encouraged them to remain in the South, as they were promised land and a share of the crops in exchange for their labor. However, high levels of debt, often resulting from unfair contracts or exploitative practices, kept freedmen from achieving financial stability. Sharecropping also limited their ability to vote, as political power was often held by land-owning white individuals. Additionally, because freedmen only had access to a small plot of land, they often struggled to produce enough crops to feed their own families.