Using evidence from the text, explain why you would find Steve Harmon guilty or not guilty of felony murder at this point in the story.
In order to determine whether Steve Harmon would be guilty or not guilty of felony murder at this point in the story, we need to analyze the evidence provided in the text. It is important to note that my analysis will be based solely on the available evidence at this particular point in the story, as the trial is still ongoing and new evidence may emerge later.
From the text, there are several factors that can be considered as evidence for both guilt and innocence:
Evidence for Guilt:
1. Presence at the crime scene: Steve Harmon was present at the drugstore during the time of the robbery and subsequent murder. He admits to being in the store, which establishes the connection to the crime scene.
2. Association with the co-defendants: Steve Harmon was acquainted with James King and Richard "Bobo" Evans, the co-defendants involved in the robbery. This association could potentially imply his involvement or knowledge of the crime.
3. Involvement in planning: Steve Harmon attended the planning session held at his friend's apartment, where the robbery was allegedly discussed. His presence at this meeting could be interpreted as evidence of his active participation or complicity in the crime.
Evidence for Not Guilty:
1. Lack of direct involvement: While Steve Harmon was present at the crime scene, there is no concrete evidence suggesting his direct participation in the robbery or the assault. Additionally, no eyewitnesses have implicated him as a participant.
2. Role as an observer: Steve Harmon's role during the robbery, as described in his own perspective in his journal, is that of an observer. He claims to have been in the store solely to film the other defendants. This account suggests that he may not have actively participated in the crime.
3. Unclear motive: As of this point in the story, there is no clear motive provided for Steve Harmon's involvement in the robbery or any evidence that suggests he had a direct motive to commit the crime.
Considering all of the available evidence, it is challenging to definitively determine whether Steve Harmon would be found guilty or not guilty of felony murder at this point in the story. While there is some evidence connecting him to the crime scene and the co-defendants, there is also evidence that suggests he may have had a passive or observational role and lacked a clear motive. It will ultimately depend on the effectiveness of the defense's arguments and the presentation of further evidence during the trial.