Based on the information given in this map why might some Southerners feel that the Missouri Compromise favored the North
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an agreement between the Northern and Southern states to maintain a balance of power between free and slave states. According to the map provided, the majority of the land acquired through the Louisiana Purchase was designated as free territory, while only Missouri was allowed to enter the Union as a slave state.
Some Southerners may feel that the Missouri Compromise favored the North because it limited the expansion of slavery into the newly acquired territories. The map shows that a significant portion of the acquired land was reserved for free states, thereby limiting the potential for slave states to be established. This could be seen as favoring the Northern states, as it restricted the expansion of their southern counterparts.
Additionally, the compromise established a dividing line at the 36°30' parallel, with slavery being allowed below that line and prohibited above it, except for the state of Missouri. Some Southerners may argue that this division unfairly restricted their ability to expand slave-holding territories, as the majority of the newly acquired land would be reserved for free states.
Furthermore, the compromise set a precedent for future discussions and decision-making on the issue of slavery, ultimately leading to the tension and conflict that would later culminate in the Civil War. Southerners who believed in the expansion of slavery may view the compromise as a betrayal of their interests, as it limited their ability to bring slavery to new territories and maintain political balance with the North.
In summary, some Southerners may feel that the Missouri Compromise favored the North due to its restriction on the expansion of slavery in the newly acquired territories, the establishment of a dividing line, and the potential long-term consequences it had regarding the issue of slavery.