Analyze the language used in two court cases recently that involves the Third Amendment. wright down the court case and year that it took place in and explain how the legal language has evolved in addressing modern challenges relating to quarantine of soldiers. one sentence
1) Engblom v. Carey, 1982: The language used in this case highlights the evolving legal understanding of the Third Amendment, as it recognizes the applicability of the amendment's protection against quartering soldiers to situations involving modern challenges such as the use of National Guard troops during state emergencies/quarantines.
2) Larrabee v. Township of Cambridge, 2017: In this case, the language employed demonstrates a continued evolution in the interpretation of the Third Amendment, as it grapples with the implications of governmental actions like mandatory quarantine, emphasizing the need for a careful and nuanced approach to the rights protected by the amendment.