Which situation was affected depending on whether a state was admitted as a free state or a slave slate representation in Congress the number of supreme Court justices amount of Western Land available for settlement existing treaties with native American tribes
The situation affected by whether a state was admitted as a free state or a slave state was the representation in Congress. Each state would send representatives and senators to Congress, and if a state entered as a free state, its representatives would likely not support slavery, while if a state entered as a slave state, its representatives would likely support slavery.
The number of Supreme Court justices could also be affected. The appointment of Supreme Court justices is made by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate. If a state entered as a free state, the President would likely nominate justices who were against slavery, while if a state entered as a slave state, the President would likely nominate justices who were supportive of slavery.
The amount of Western land available for settlement could also be influenced by whether a state was admitted as a free state or a slave state. The issue of whether slavery would be allowed in newly acquired territories often led to heated debates and compromises. The entrance of a state as a free state or slave state would determine whether slavery was allowed or prohibited in those territories, thus potentially affecting the availability of land for settlement.
Existing treaties with Native American tribes could also be impacted. The issue of slavery was often intertwined with the treatment and land rights of Native American tribes. An admission of a state as a free state or slave state could potentially impact the treatment and rights of Native American tribes outlined in existing treaties, depending on the politics and policies of the respective state in relation to slavery.