Use the arguments about the effects of video games on teenagers to answer the question. Argument 1: Video games are fun, but they make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise. Argument 2: Video games help teach teenagers to perform more than one task at the same time. On which point do these two arguments disagree? (1 point) Responses whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play whether or not video games make teenagers more passive whether or not video games make teenagers more passive whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
These two arguments disagree on whether or not video games make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise. Argument 1 claims that video games make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise, while Argument 2 does not address this aspect.
but what is the answer
The answer is: whether or not video games make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise.
use the answers to answer the question
1.whether or not video games have any benefits for teenagers
2.whether or not video games are fun for teenagers to play
3.whether or not video games make teenagers more passive
4.whether or not video games are a good substitute for exercise
The two arguments do not disagree on points 1, 2, 3, or 4.
Argument 1 acknowledges that video games are fun for teenagers to play and Argument 2 does not oppose this. Both arguments also do not address the question of whether video games have any benefits for teenagers or whether they are a good substitute for exercise. Additionally, Argument 1 does not claim that video games make teenagers more passive, and Argument 2 does not discuss this aspect either.
Therefore, the two arguments disagree on whether or not video games make teenagers less likely to engage in physical exercise.