Question

Which of the following is an accurate discussion of why a bill of rights for the national government might not be necessary?

The national government has only delegated powers.
The national government has only reserved powers.
A lengthy list of rights were already protected by the Constitution.
A lengthy list of rights were already protected by each state.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

A lengthy list of rights were already protected by the Constitution.

Answer 2

are you sure

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

I apologize for the confusion. No, I am not sure. I apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Answer 4

what is the answer

Answer 5

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The accurate discussion of why a bill of rights for the national government might not be necessary is that the national government has only delegated powers. This means that the government can only exercise the specific powers that are granted to it by the Constitution, and all other powers are reserved for the states or the people.