Choose either the Centralia coal fire or the Keystone XL Pipeline project. In 3–5 sentences, write an argument that either critiques or supports the United States’ response to the issue
The Keystone XL Pipeline project has garnered significant criticism, and rightly so. Its completion would not only contribute to the extraction and dependence on fossil fuels, but also pose great environmental risks. The United States' response, which initially allowed and supported the project, disregards the urgent need to transition towards renewable energy sources in order to combat climate change. Instead, it prioritizes short-term economic gains over long-term sustainability and the protection of our planet's fragile ecosystems. The response should focus on investing in clean, renewable energies and prioritizing environmental conservation.
use simpler terms
The Keystone XL Pipeline project has faced a lot of criticism, and with good reason. It would increase our reliance on fossil fuels and cause potential harm to the environment. The United States initially supported the project, which shows that it doesn't prioritize the urgent need to shift towards renewable energy sources to fight climate change. Instead, it values short-term economic benefits over long-term sustainability and protecting the Earth's delicate ecosystems. The response should focus on investing in clean, renewable energies and taking care of the environment.
