I was concrete better than stone Ford building in the Rome
There are several reasons why concrete was preferred over stone in building the Ford building in Rome:
1. Cost: Concrete is relatively cheaper than stone, making it a more economical choice for large-scale projects like the Ford building.
2. Versatility: Concrete offers greater flexibility in terms of shape and design compared to stone. It can be easily molded into various shapes and sizes, allowing for more creative and intricate architectural designs.
3. Speed of construction: Concrete structures can be built more quickly compared to stone buildings, as pouring and setting the material is a relatively faster process. This would have been advantageous in meeting tight construction timelines for the Ford building.
4. Strength and durability: Concrete possesses high compressive strength and durability, making it a suitable material for constructing long-lasting buildings. This would have been important for a commercial building like the Ford building, which needs to withstand daily use and potential wear and tear.
5. Ease of maintenance: Concrete is relatively easier to maintain compared to stone. It can be painted or coated to protect it from weathering and can be repaired more easily if necessary.
Although stone has its own benefits, such as aesthetic appeal and potential longevity, the aforementioned advantages may have influenced the decision to use concrete for the Ford building in Rome.