respond to this post: White stars before the Titanics plummet, said this about the ship. "The largest most luxurious and best-appointed vessel that ever floated, she seemed proof against any disaster." I have two opinions on this. It's possible that what they said is completely bias and all they were truly after was possibly the money mostly millionaire passengers as said in the article. They got far too courageous and put over 1,000 lives on the line, and the ship sadly still sunk. Proving that wrong biases truly can have major consequences. It's entirely possible they thought that since "5,000 passengers could accommodate abroad her" that it was well made for any disaster, but it's still a bias and still put others at risk for such egocentrism.

Question

respond to this post: White stars before the Titanics plummet, said this about the ship. "The largest most luxurious and best-appointed vessel that ever floated, she seemed proof against any disaster." I have two opinions on this. It's possible that what they said is completely bias and all they were truly after was possibly the money mostly millionaire passengers as said in the article. They got far too courageous and put over 1,000 lives on the line, and the ship sadly still sunk. Proving that wrong biases truly can have major consequences. It's entirely possible they thought that since "5,000 passengers could accommodate abroad her" that it was well made for any disaster, but it's still a bias and still put others at risk for such egocentrism.

Answer 1

I understand your perspective on this statement. It is indeed possible that the statement made by White Star Line was biased, driven by their desire for profits and attracting wealthy passengers. Their emphasis on the ship's grandeur and invincibility may have been exaggerated and misleading.

You raise a valid point about the potential consequences of such biases. The false confidence in the ship's unsinkability led to the disregard of certain safety precautions, putting over 1,000 lives at risk. This highlights the importance of considering objective information and avoiding overconfidence in order to prevent potentially disastrous outcomes.

Furthermore, you correctly identify the egocentrism involved in prioritizing the luxurious experience for the wealthy passengers over the safety of all onboard. This demonstrates a lack of consideration for the lives of others and the potential dangers they could face. It serves as a reminder that personal biases and self-interests should never supersede the well-being and safety of others.

In conclusion, the statement made by White Star Line may have been biased and driven by financial motivations. The consequences that followed emphasize the need to balance objectivity, caution, and consideration for others' safety when making such claims.