Which of the following best analyzes the impact of European trade on the development of European cities?(1 point)
Responses
There was less trade in European cities because most of it was done between the Western Hemisphere and Asia.
There was less trade in European cities because most of it was done between the Western Hemisphere and Asia.
It became harder to trade in cities because rulers created more limitations to prevent foreign goods.
It became harder to trade in cities because rulers created more limitations to prevent foreign goods.
Global trade made it possible for new ideas to form and spread, and cities helped ideas spread quickly.
Global trade made it possible for new ideas to form and spread, and cities helped ideas spread quickly.
European trade did not really impact the development of European cities because they did not get larger.
The correct answer is: Global trade made it possible for new ideas to form and spread, and cities helped ideas spread quickly.
European trade had a significant impact on the development of European cities. As trade networks expanded across the globe, European cities became hubs of economic activity, attracting merchants, artisans, and workers. The increasing flow of goods and people fostered cultural exchange, innovation, and the spread of ideas. Consequently, cities became centers of intellectual and artistic development, contributing to Europe's overall cultural and economic growth.