How can total war be described in terms of how it involves a civilian population?(1 point) Responses Civilians are not involved in a total war. Civilians are not involved in a total war. A total war mobilizes a civilian population to support the war effort, but does not see them directly involved in the battlefield. A total war mobilizes a civilian population to support the war effort, but does not see them directly involved in the battlefield. A total war mobilizes a civilian population to support the war effort and will see them targeted by the enemy. A total war mobilizes a civilian population to support the war effort and will see them targeted by the enemy. A total war targets civilians in order to destroy the enemy, but does not involve them in the war effort.
A total war mobilizes a civilian population to support the war effort and will see them targeted by the enemy.
What is the difference between a limited war and a total war?(1 point) Responses Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer. With a total war, those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy. Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer. With a total war, those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy. Limited war targets civilians and infrastructure because it has a limited scope of focus, while total war targets everything because it has no focus. Limited war targets civilians and infrastructure because it has a limited scope of focus, while total war targets everything because it has no focus. Limited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal. With total war, the goals are not limited and are often numerous and specific. Limited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal. With total war, the goals are not limited and are often numerous and specific. Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because of the rules of engagement that both sides agree to ahead of time. Total war does not have agreed-upon rules of engagement.
Limited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal, often with specific objectives. It may not target civilians or infrastructure, as the intent is usually to achieve specific political or territorial objectives, rather than total destruction. Total war, on the other hand, does not have limits or specific objectives. Its goal is the complete destruction or unconditional surrender of the enemy, which may involve targeting civilians, infrastructure, and any means necessary to achieve victory.
What new technologies were invented during World War I?(1 point) Responses airplanes and reconnaissance airplanes and reconnaissance automobiles and submarines automobiles and submarines tanks, poison gas, ambulance tanks, poison gas, ambulance observational balloons and zeppelins
airplanes and reconnaissance, automobiles and submarines, tanks, poison gas, ambulance, observational balloons and zeppelins.
Compare the Eastern and Western Fronts of World War I. Which statement gives the most accurate comparison?(1 point) Responses The Western Front was stagnant, but had many offensives. The Eastern Front had fewer offensives, but the front shifted considerably during each one. The Western Front was stagnant, but had many offensives. The Eastern Front had fewer offensives, but the front shifted considerably during each one. The Western Front was stagnant, while the Eastern Front shifted a lot. They had roughly the same number of offensives. The Western Front was stagnant, while the Eastern Front shifted a lot. They had roughly the same number of offensives. The Western Front moved constantly and had many offensives. The Eastern Front had little movement and fewer offensives. The Western Front moved constantly and had many offensives. The Eastern Front had little movement and fewer offensives. The Western Front had few offensives and little movement. The Eastern Front had more offensives and moved constantly
The Western Front was stagnant, but had many offensives. The Eastern Front had fewer offensives, but the front shifted considerably during each one.
Which of the following accurately summarizes the involvement of the United States in World War I?(1 point) Responses Initially, the U.S. was politically neutral and was involved only economically; however, once the U.S. entered the war its military involvement helped force an armistice. Initially, the U.S. was politically neutral and was involved only economically; however, once the U.S. entered the war its military involvement helped force an armistice. The U.S. joined the Allied forces in 1914, but did not send troops until 1917, which eventually forced Germany to surrender. The U.S. joined the Allied forces in 1914, but did not send troops until 1917, which eventually forced Germany to surrender. Initially, the U.S. was politically neutral and completely uninvolved; however, once it joined the Central powers they helped force Germany to surrender. Initially, the U.S. was politically neutral and completely uninvolved; however, once it joined the Central powers they helped force Germany to surrender. The U.S. was involved economically, which provided critical resources for Allied forces and Central powers that forced a German armistice.
Initially, the U.S. was politically neutral and was involved only economically; however, once the U.S. entered the war its military involvement helped force an armistice.
